 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| tarah , iran terror, www sex old women , talk, galotta, onion print edition, terrebonne parish, charles gibson, restraint, chauvin, man woman sex , behaviour, captain stabin , anal sex woman on woman , milf sex movies , mikesapartment , ringling brothers barnum and bailey circus, abc, | And, from another of Clayton Cramer's posts on the same topic: [link to www.claytoncramer.com] But because the ACLU has to dance to the tune of their bruno b masters, it wasn't enough to argue that this was an equal protection violation. {Kansas Attorney-General] Kline cited a footnote in bruno b the ACLU's brief for Limon, in which it said teenagers have a well-established "liberty interest in being free from state compulsion" in making personal decisions about sex and marriage. bruno b "I'll tell you what: I would be deeply offended if, when my daughter turns 13, she walks out the door to meet her 30-year-old boyfriend, and I say 'no,' and she says, 'I've got a 1-800 number for the ACLU; it's my constitutional right,' " Kline said. "That's their argument. They have to live with it." While Lange acknowledged the ACLU said teenagers have the right to make personal decisions about marriage and sex, she said the state can override that right if it can show it has a compelling state interest -- such as protecting children. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| [emphasis added]" The original link he gives is broken, but here's a good link to the brief in question: [link to www.aclu.org] And this... UPDATE 2: I just noticed something else interesting about the ACLU's brief in defense of Limon: they are arguing that a minor has a iran terror "liberty interest" in having sex free of government compulsion. If they were defending a minor against a criminal charge, iran terror this would be at least plausibly related to the question--but in this case, they were defending an adult against a criminal charge. There might well be an equal protection argument based an iran terror adult's "liberty interest," but they were defending the adult--not the minor. The ACLU was arguing for the right of a minor to have sex--but it was really the right of an adult to have sex with a minor who apparently said, "No." This is even more monstrous than I first noticed. Later, - cicero418 / Wednesday November 30, 2005 12:53:49 AM EST - Reply to this comment / Flag this comment re: Actually, he may well be right for the wrong reasons. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
