college drunk girl, zen, religion, swingers, college, federal case law, beach, personal appearances, minor laws, review, mom and son sex galleries, postsecularism, vice president, poetry, swinging, legal practice area, laura bush, to,
|
Relying on Freedman, the Court holds that those charged with the management teen rape of the auditorium have the burden of instituting judicial proceedings, that "restraint" prior to judicial review can be imposed only for a specified brief period, teen rape and that a prompt final judicial determination must be assured. Ante, at 560. If these standards are applicable only where a lease for a production teen rape is refused on the grounds that the production is putatively obscene, the Court has performed the rather novel feat of elevating obscene productions to a preferred position under the First Amendment. If these procedures must be invoked every time the management of a municipal theater declines to lease the facilities, whether or not because of the putative obscenity of the performance, other questions are raised. What will be the issues to be tried in these proceedings? Is the Court actually saying that unless the city of Chattanooga could criminally punish a person for staging a performance in a theater which he owned, it may not deny a lease to that same person in order for him to stage that performance in a theater owned by the city?
|