anime rape, 1999 cricket world cup, legalprofessionals, satire, rapeporn, case law, wage and hour, driving drunk, video: drama, movie, how, ezine, author,
|
[ Footnote 9 ] This case is clearly distinguishable from Heller v. New York, 413U.S. 483 (1973). There, state authorities seized a copy of a film, temporarily, in order to preserve it as evidence. Id., at 490. The Court held stage that there was not "any form of `final restraint,' in the sense stage of being enjoined from exhibition or stage threatened with destruction." Ibid. Here, the board did not merely detain temporarily a copy of the script or libretto for the musical. Respondents reached a final decision to bar performance. [ Footnote 10 ] See Monaghan, First Amendment "Due Process," 83 Harv. L. Rev. 518, 522-524 (1970); Emerson, The Doctrine of Prior Restraint, 20 Law & Contemp. Prob. 648, 656-659 (1955). [ Footnote 11 ] There was testimony that the musical as performed differed "substantially" from the script, App. 79-80, and that the show was varied to fit the anticipated tastes of different audiences in different parts of the country. Id., at 93. The musical's nude scene, apparently the most controversial portion, was played under varying conditions.
|