falafael, computer stuff, drunk guys, drunkteen fuck, uncensored, 2001, cock, law, australia, attorney resource., magazine, lingerie, links, media, stories, plays, footfetish, radical orthodoxy, devil, laws, abovethe law, conspiracy duck, video, pissed off,
|
Here we deal with municipal action by the city of Chattanooga, not prohibiting or penalizing the expression of views in dramatic form by citizens at large, but rather managing its municipal auditorium. In Adderley v. Florida (1966), the Court said: "The State, no less than a private owner of property, has power to preserve the drunk driving conviction property under its control for the drunk driving conviction use to which it is lawfully dedicated. For this reason there is no merit to the petitioners' argument that they drunk driving conviction had a constitutional right to stay on the property . . . . The United States Constitution does not forbid a State to control the use of its own property for its own lawful nondiscriminatory purpose." The Court avoids the impact of cases such as Adderley by insisting that the municipal auditorium and the theater were "public forums designed for and dedicated to expressive activities," and that the rejection of petitioner's application was not based on "any regulation of time, place, or manner related to the nature of the facility or applications from other users."
|