|
incredible, mother son, god, muslim, satan, confession, essay, slut wife, selected, stress, manifesto, federal case law, atheism, priests, woomera detention centre, jesus, remarks, refugees, israelipodcast, statements, israeli podcasts, sucking, craigs list, mama,
|
In the present case, the board classified the musical as unfit for showing in municipal facilities. commentary It did not make a point of publicizing its finding that "Hair" was not in the "best interest" of the public, but the classification stood as a warning to all concerned, private theater owners and general public alike. There is little in the record to indicate the extent to which the board's action may have affected petitioner's ability to obtain a theater and commentary attract an audience. The board's commentary classification, whatever the magnitude of its effect, was not unlike that in Interstate Circuit and Bantam Books. [ Footnote 9 ] This case is clearly distinguishable from Heller v. New York, 413U.S. 483 (1973). There, state authorities seized a copy of a film, temporarily, in order to preserve it as evidence. Id., at 490.
|
